linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/9] regulator: pwm-regulator: Introduce continuous-mode
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 16:44:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150709154430.GC3445@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150709151429.6daf8fcb@bbrezillon>

> > > Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > This patch-set has been rebased on to topic/pwm.
> > > >   
> > > > Continuous mode uses the PWM regulator's maximum and minimum supplied
> > > > voltages specified in the regulator-{min,max}-microvolt properties to
> > > > calculate appropriate duty-cycle values.  This allows for a much more
> > > > fine grained solution when compared with voltage-table mode, which
> > > > this driver already supports.  This solution does make an assumption
> > > > that a %50 duty-cycle value will cause the regulator voltage to run
> > > > at half way between the supplied max_uV and min_uV values.
> > > 
> > > Well, I'm not sure this assumption works for all pwm driven regulators.
> > > What if your regulator does not react linearly to the PWM duty-cycle
> > > config ?
> > > 
> > > How about addressing that by using all the entries of the
> > > voltage<->duty table association and doing the linear interpolation
> > > between the provided points instead of doing it on the min -> max
> > > range ?
> > 
> > If you wish to add a 3rd mode, then I'm sure Mark will accept
> > submissions, but I think what you are suggesting would be pretty
> > complex and out-of-scope of what this patch-set is trying to achieve.
> 
> Okay, still don't get the need to add a new mode which is almost doing
> the same thing when we could have implemented it in a generic way in the
> first place. But if your version has already been accepted then I think
> I'll have to propose a new mode :-/.

This solution is very generic.  What you're suggesting is pretty
non-standard I think.  This solution specifically doesn't account for
wonky/non-linear PWM regulators -- that's why I made the effort to
write it as an explicit assumption.

FYI, I just sent a patch amending the binding documentation.  It
should prevent any further confusion.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-09 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-07 15:06 [PATCH v2 0/9] regulator: pwm-regulator: Introduce continuous-mode Lee Jones
2015-07-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable ST's PWM driver Lee Jones
2015-07-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable ST's Power Reset driver Lee Jones
2015-07-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable support for PWM Regulators Lee Jones
2015-07-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] ARM: STi: STiH407: Move PWM nodes STiH407 => STiH407-family Lee Jones
2015-07-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] ARM: STi: STiH407: Add PWM Regulator node Lee Jones
2015-07-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] regulator: pwm-regulator: Re-write bindings Lee Jones
2015-07-09  8:01   ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] regulator: pwm-regulator: Add support for continuous-voltage Lee Jones
2015-07-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] regulator: pwm-regulator: Simplify voltage to duty-cycle call Lee Jones
2015-07-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] regulator: pwm-regulator: Don't assign structure attributes right away Lee Jones
2015-07-09  6:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] regulator: pwm-regulator: Introduce continuous-mode Boris Brezillon
2015-07-09 11:51   ` Lee Jones
2015-07-09 13:14     ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-09 15:44       ` Lee Jones [this message]
2015-07-09 16:25       ` Doug Anderson
2015-07-09 17:20         ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150709154430.GC3445@x1 \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).