From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:14:40 +0200 Subject: [PATCH-v3 02/11] i2c: pxa: No need to set slave addr for i2c master mode reset In-Reply-To: <559FBCD3.4050402@linaro.org> References: <1436210695-19159-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <1436210695-19159-3-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <20150710081148.GB1528@katana> <559FBCD3.4050402@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20150710141440.GA6594@katana> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 06:08:43PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: > > > On Friday 10 July 2015 01:41 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 12:54:46AM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: > >>Normally i2c controller works as master, so slave addr is not needed, or it > >>will impact some slave device (eg. ST NFC chip) i2c accesses, because it has > >>the same i2c address with controller. > > > >Just to make sure: Does it? As I read the code, slave interrupts are > >enabled later only when slave mode is selected? Is that a HW bug? And if > >so, can't the code just be moved into this #ifdef block later? > > > > Yes we could, infact I thought about it; > but I would break recommended sequence here. And did you set the "own slave address" to a value which one of your existing i2c slaves also has (without enabling slave mode)? Did it disturb communication? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: