From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/10] arm64/debug: More consistent naming for the BRK ESR template macro
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:19:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150713141920.GF19083@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436793967-7138-6-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:25:52PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
> The naming of DBG_ESR_VAL_BRK is inconsistent with the way other
> similar macros are named.
>
> This patch makes the naming more consistent, and appends "64"
> as a reminder that this ESR pattern only matches from AArch64
> state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Looks sane to me, though I think it should probably be merged with the
subsequenty patch moving the definition out to esr.h.
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mark.
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h | 5 +++--
> arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> index ff09058..bb97e9d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> @@ -46,8 +46,9 @@
> /*
> * ESR values expected for dynamic and compile time BRK instruction
> */
> -#define DBG_ESR_VAL_BRK(x) \
> - ((ESR_ELx_EC_BRK64 << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT) | ESR_ELx_IL | ((x) & 0xffff))
> +#define ESR_ELx_VAL_BRK64(imm) \
> + ((ESR_ELx_EC_BRK64 << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT) | ESR_ELx_IL | \
> + ((imm) & 0xffff))
>
> /*
> * #imm16 values used for BRK instruction generation
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c
> index a0d10c5..a5a838e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c
> @@ -235,13 +235,13 @@ static int kgdb_step_brk_fn(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
>
> static struct break_hook kgdb_brkpt_hook = {
> .esr_mask = 0xffffffff,
> - .esr_val = DBG_ESR_VAL_BRK(KGDB_DYN_DBG_BRK_IMM),
> + .esr_val = ESR_ELx_VAL_BRK64(KGDB_DYN_DBG_BRK_IMM),
> .fn = kgdb_brk_fn
> };
>
> static struct break_hook kgdb_compiled_brkpt_hook = {
> .esr_mask = 0xffffffff,
> - .esr_val = DBG_ESR_VAL_BRK(KGDB_COMPILED_DBG_BRK_IMM),
> + .esr_val = ESR_ELx_VAL_BRK64(KGDB_COMPILED_DBG_BRK_IMM),
> .fn = kgdb_compiled_brk_fn
> };
>
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-13 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-13 13:25 [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: Use BRK instruction for generic BUG traps Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] arm64/debug: Eliminate magic number for size of BRK instruction Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:47 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] arm64/debug: Mask off all reserved bits from generated ESR values Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:14 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 14:22 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] arm64: esr.h type fixes and cleanup Dave Martin
2015-07-14 15:54 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-14 16:53 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] arm64/debug: Eliminate magic number from ESR template definition Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:16 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] arm64/debug: More consistent naming for the BRK ESR template macro Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:19 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] arm64/debug: Move BRK ESR template macro into <asm/esr.h> Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:18 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] arm64/debug: Simplify BRK insn opcode declarations Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:38 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] arm64/debug: Add missing #include Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:34 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 14:44 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:45 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] arm64/BUG: Use BRK instruction for generic BUG traps Dave Martin
2015-07-13 16:43 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 16:51 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 16:56 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 17:05 ` Dave P Martin
2015-07-14 10:20 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-14 11:09 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-14 11:34 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-14 15:51 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-14 16:53 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-14 16:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-14 16:55 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] arm64/BUG: Show explicit backtrace for WARNs Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150713141920.GF19083@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).