From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/10] arm64/debug: Add missing #include
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:45:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150713144536.GI19083@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150713144433.GB10670@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 03:44:34PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 03:34:36PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:25:55PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
> > > <asm/debug-monitors.h> relies on <asm/ptrace.h>, but doesn't
> > > declare this dependency. This becomes a problem once
> > > debug-monitors.h starts getting included all over the place to get
> > > the BRK immedates.
> >
> > I take it that's for struct pt_regs down in the ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> > portion?
>
> Yes ... I suppose I could move the #include in there, but it seems
> hermless. I prefer to keep them together.
I was just checking that I hadn't missed something -- no need to move
it.
Mark.
>
> >
> > >
> > > This patch adds the missing #include.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> > > index 6a17fb8..b5715cb 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> > >
> > > #include <asm/esr.h>
> > > #include <asm/insn.h>
> > > +#include <asm/ptrace.h>
> >
> > We're also missing <linux/types.h> (for struct list_head, u8, and u32),
> > and <linux/errno.h> (for ENODEV in the reinstall_suspended_bps stub).
> > Would you be able to fold those in?
>
> Sure, can do.
>
> > With those:
> >
> > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>
> Cheers
> ---Dave
>
> >
> > Mark.
> >
> > >
> > > /* Low-level stepping controls. */
> > > #define DBG_MDSCR_SS (1 << 0)
> > > --
> > > 1.7.10.4
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-13 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-13 13:25 [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: Use BRK instruction for generic BUG traps Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] arm64/debug: Eliminate magic number for size of BRK instruction Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:47 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] arm64/debug: Mask off all reserved bits from generated ESR values Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:14 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 14:22 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] arm64: esr.h type fixes and cleanup Dave Martin
2015-07-14 15:54 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-14 16:53 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] arm64/debug: Eliminate magic number from ESR template definition Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:16 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] arm64/debug: More consistent naming for the BRK ESR template macro Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:19 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] arm64/debug: Move BRK ESR template macro into <asm/esr.h> Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:18 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] arm64/debug: Simplify BRK insn opcode declarations Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:38 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] arm64/debug: Add missing #include Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:34 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 14:44 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:45 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] arm64/BUG: Use BRK instruction for generic BUG traps Dave Martin
2015-07-13 16:43 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 16:51 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 16:56 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 17:05 ` Dave P Martin
2015-07-14 10:20 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-14 11:09 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-14 11:34 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-14 15:51 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-14 16:53 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-14 16:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-14 16:55 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] arm64/BUG: Show explicit backtrace for WARNs Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150713144536.GI19083@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox