From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM64: kernel: unify ACPI and DT cpus initialization
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:00:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150713150003.GA15311@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5553C99A.5020706@redhat.com>
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:00:58PM +0100, Al Stone wrote:
> On 05/13/2015 07:12 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > The code that initializes cpus on arm64 is currently split in two
> > different code paths that carry out DT and ACPI cpus initialization.
> >
> > Most of the code executing SMP initialization is common and should
> > be merged to reduce discrepancies between ACPI and DT initialization
> > and to have code initializing cpus in a single common place in the
> > kernel.
> >
> > This patch refactors arm64 SMP cpus initialization code to merge
> > ACPI and DT boot paths in a common file and to create sanity
> > checks that can be reused by both boot methods.
> >
> > Current code assumes PSCI is the only available boot method
> > when arm64 boots with ACPI; this can be easily extended if/when
> > the ACPI parking protocol is merged into the kernel.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> > Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> > Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [DT]
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> [snip...]
>
> These patches look pretty good so far, but I've only just started
> reviewing them. This one raised the question: do we know if there
> is someone already working on parking protocol? I've seen a form
> of it working on AMD Seattles but I don't recall seeing any patches
> being submitted -- I'll search archives again, just in case I missed
> it the first time, but if there is someone working on it, that would
> be good to know.
FYI, I took M.Salter's initial patch for parking protocol and refactored it
for upstream on top of 4.2-rc2, I will drop it on the list asap.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-13 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-13 13:12 [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM64: consolidate ACPI/DT SMP initialization Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-05-13 13:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM64: kernel: make cpu_ops hooks DT agnostic Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-05-13 13:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM64: kernel: unify ACPI and DT cpus initialization Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-05-13 22:00 ` Al Stone
2015-05-15 8:58 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-07-13 15:00 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150713150003.GA15311@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).