From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 13:02:22 +0200 Subject: [RFC PATCH 14/15] regulator: pwm: implement ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods In-Reply-To: <20150714105019.GR11162@sirena.org.uk> References: <1435738921-25027-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1435738921-25027-15-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20150714105019.GR11162@sirena.org.uk> Message-ID: <20150714130222.1bdfedc5@bbrezillon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Mark, On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:50:19 +0100 Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:22:00AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > Implement the ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods and remove > > the PWM call in ->set_voltage_sel(). > > This doesn't apply, please check and resend. This series was made on top of Linus' tree (4.2-rc1 IIRC) and patch 14 and 15 were not meant to be applied without Thierry's approval (they depend on other changes in the PWM framework). I can rebase them on top of linux-next (or just on top of Linus' 4.2-rc2) if Thierry is okay with that, but I don't think rebasing them on your regulator's for-next branch is a good idea. Thierry, Mark, let me know what you prefer. Thanks, Boris -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com