From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:00:16 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/5] arm64, pci: Allow RC drivers to supply pcibios_add_device() implementation. In-Reply-To: <55A7E334.3030101@caviumnetworks.com> References: <1436979285-8177-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> <1436979285-8177-4-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> <20150716090426.GA17097@red-moon> <55A7E334.3030101@caviumnetworks.com> Message-ID: <20150717110016.GB19067@red-moon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi David, On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 06:00:36PM +0100, David Daney wrote: > On 07/16/2015 02:04 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 05:54:43PM +0100, David Daney wrote: > >> From: David Daney > >> > [...] > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > >> index 4095379..3356023 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > >> @@ -38,11 +38,21 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res, > >> return res->start; > >> } > >> > >> +static int (*pcibios_add_device_impl)(struct pci_dev *); > >> + > >> +void set_pcibios_add_device(int (*arg)(struct pci_dev *)) > >> +{ > >> + pcibios_add_device_impl = arg; > >> +} > >> + > >> /* > >> * Try to assign the IRQ number from DT when adding a new device > >> */ > >> int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev) > >> { > >> + if (pcibios_add_device_impl) > >> + return pcibios_add_device_impl(dev); > > > > I am totally against this (and to be honest by reading the other > > patches I failed to understand why you even need it), see above. > > > > It is because ... > > > > Thanks, > > Lorenzo > > > >> + > >> dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0); > > > ... this is total crap. But I didn't want to break existing systems. That's a good aim, but you are still failing to explain the issue properly I am afraid. > The PCI RC drivers need a way to configure the legacy virtual-wire > interrupts, because the existing code doesn't do it. Can I ask you please to explain the issue a bit more clearly (and why the OF API does not work for you ?) Thank you ! Lorenzo