linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/18] arm64: introduce CONFIG_ARM64_LSE_ATOMICS as fallback to ll/sc atomics
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:32:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150717163219.GA4208@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436779519-2232-6-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:25:06AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> In order to patch in the new atomic instructions at runtime, we need to
> generate wrappers around the out-of-line exclusive load/store atomics.
> 
> This patch adds a new Kconfig option, CONFIG_ARM64_LSE_ATOMICS. which
> causes our atomic functions to branch to the out-of-line ll/sc
> implementations. To avoid the register spill overhead of the PCS, the
> out-of-line functions are compiled with specific compiler flags to
> force out-of-line save/restore of any registers that are usually
> caller-saved.

I'm still trying to get my head around those -ffixed -fcall-used
options.

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
> +/*
> + * Based on arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 1996 Russell King.
> + * Copyright (C) 2002 Deep Blue Solutions Ltd.
> + * Copyright (C) 2012 ARM Ltd.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_ATOMIC_LSE_H
> +#define __ASM_ATOMIC_LSE_H
> +
> +#ifndef __ARM64_IN_ATOMIC_IMPL
> +#error "please don't include this file directly"
> +#endif
> +
> +/* Move the ll/sc atomics out-of-line */
> +#define __LL_SC_INLINE
> +#define __LL_SC_PREFIX(x)	__ll_sc_##x
> +#define __LL_SC_EXPORT(x)	EXPORT_SYMBOL(__LL_SC_PREFIX(x))
> +
> +/* Macros for constructing calls to out-of-line ll/sc atomics */
> +#define __LL_SC_SAVE_LR(r)	"mov\t" #r ", x30\n"
> +#define __LL_SC_RESTORE_LR(r)	"mov\tx30, " #r "\n"
> +#define __LL_SC_CALL(op)						\
> +	"bl\t" __stringify(__LL_SC_PREFIX(atomic_##op)) "\n"
> +#define __LL_SC_CALL64(op)						\
> +	"bl\t" __stringify(__LL_SC_PREFIX(atomic64_##op)) "\n"
> +
> +#define ATOMIC_OP(op, asm_op)						\
> +static inline void atomic_##op(int i, atomic_t *v)			\
> +{									\
> +	unsigned long lr;						\
> +	register int w0 asm ("w0") = i;					\
> +	register atomic_t *x1 asm ("x1") = v;				\
> +									\
> +	asm volatile(							\
> +	__LL_SC_SAVE_LR(%0)						\
> +	__LL_SC_CALL(op)						\
> +	__LL_SC_RESTORE_LR(%0)						\
> +	: "=&r" (lr), "+r" (w0), "+Q" (v->counter)			\
> +	: "r" (x1));							\
> +}									\

Since that's an inline function, in most cases we wouldn't need to
save/restore LR for a BL call, it may already be on the stack of the
including functions. Can we just not tell gcc that LR is clobbered by
this asm and it makes its own decision about saving/restoring?

As for v->counter, could we allocate it in callee-saved registers
already and avoid the -ffixed etc. options.

But note that I'm still trying to understand all these tricks, so I may
be wrong.

-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-17 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-13  9:25 [PATCH 00/18] arm64: support for 8.1 LSE atomic instructions Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 01/18] arm64: cpufeature.h: add missing #include of kernel.h Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 02/18] arm64: atomics: move ll/sc atomics into separate header file Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 03/18] arm64: elf: advertise 8.1 atomic instructions as new hwcap Will Deacon
2015-07-17 13:48   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-17 13:57     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 04/18] arm64: alternatives: add cpu feature for lse atomics Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 05/18] arm64: introduce CONFIG_ARM64_LSE_ATOMICS as fallback to ll/sc atomics Will Deacon
2015-07-17 16:32   ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2015-07-17 17:25     ` Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 06/18] arm64: atomics: patch in lse instructions when supported by the CPU Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 07/18] arm64: locks: " Will Deacon
2015-07-21 16:53   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-21 17:29     ` Will Deacon
2015-07-23 13:39       ` Will Deacon
2015-07-23 14:14         ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 08/18] arm64: bitops: " Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 09/18] arm64: xchg: " Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 10/18] arm64: cmpxchg: " Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 11/18] arm64: cmpxchg_dbl: " Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 12/18] arm64: cmpxchg: avoid "cc" clobber in ll/sc routines Will Deacon
2015-07-21 17:16   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-21 17:32     ` Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 13/18] arm64: cmpxchg: avoid memory barrier on comparison failure Will Deacon
2015-07-13 10:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-13 11:22     ` Will Deacon
2015-07-13 13:39       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-13 14:52         ` Will Deacon
2015-07-13 15:32           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-13 15:58             ` Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 14/18] arm64: atomics: tidy up common atomic{,64}_* macros Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 15/18] arm64: atomics: prefetch the destination word for write prior to stxr Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 16/18] arm64: atomics: implement atomic{, 64}_cmpxchg using cmpxchg Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 17/18] arm64: atomic64_dec_if_positive: fix incorrect branch condition Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 18/18] arm64: kconfig: select HAVE_CMPXCHG_LOCAL Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150717163219.GA4208@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).