From: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com (Dmitry Torokhov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] input: touchscreen: pixcir_i2c_ts: Add support for optional wakeup interrupt
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 23:33:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150720063323.GC13092@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150720060506.GV17550@atomide.com>
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:05:07PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com> [150719 21:51]:
> > On 7/18/2015 3:21 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > >
> > > I wonder if driver core should be responsible for clearing wake irq and
> > > also for clearing wakeup flag.
> > >
> >
> > AFAICU, wakeup flag is deleted when struct device is deleted, hence,
> > device_init_wakeup() call may not be required in .remove(). But,
> > dev_pm_clear_wake_irq() can be moved to driver core.
>
> Currently the lifecycle of struct wakeup_source is not necessarily
> the same as the lifecycle struct device. I believe net and usb drivers
> at least allocate it dynamically.
I am not sure if I follow. I was wondering if we should clear the wakeup
IRQ setting on the driver unbinding. It does not mean that we'd be
deleting wakeup_source, just that we'll clear wakeup irq setting from
it.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-20 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-17 6:40 [PATCH 0/2] pixcir_i2c_ts: Add optional wakeup irq support Vignesh R
2015-07-17 6:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] input: touchscreen: pixcir_i2c_ts: Add support for optional wakeup interrupt Vignesh R
2015-07-17 21:51 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-07-20 4:48 ` Vignesh R
2015-07-20 6:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-07-20 6:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2015-07-20 9:48 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-07-17 6:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: am437x-gp-evm: Add wakeup interrupt source for pixcir_i2c_tsc Vignesh R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150720063323.GC13092@dtor-ws \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).