linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/18] arm64: cmpxchg: avoid "cc" clobber in ll/sc routines
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 18:32:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150721173212.GP31095@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150721171607.GF7250@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 06:16:07PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:25:13AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > We can perform the cmpxchg comparison using eor and cbnz which avoids
> > the "cc" clobber for the ll/sc case and consequently for the LSE case
> > where we may have to fall-back on the ll/sc code at runtime.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h | 14 ++++++--------
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h   |  4 ++--
> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h
> > index 77d3aabf52ad..d21091bae901 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h
> > @@ -96,14 +96,13 @@ __LL_SC_PREFIX(atomic_cmpxchg(atomic_t *ptr, int old, int new))
> >  
> >  	asm volatile("// atomic_cmpxchg\n"
> >  "1:	ldxr	%w1, %2\n"
> > -"	cmp	%w1, %w3\n"
> > -"	b.ne	2f\n"
> > +"	eor	%w0, %w1, %w3\n"
> > +"	cbnz	%w0, 2f\n"
> >  "	stxr	%w0, %w4, %2\n"
> >  "	cbnz	%w0, 1b\n"
> >  "2:"
> >  	: "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (oldval), "+Q" (ptr->counter)
> > -	: "Ir" (old), "r" (new)
> > -	: "cc");
> > +	: "Lr" (old), "r" (new));
> 
> For the LL/SC case, does this make things any slower? We replace a cmp +
> b.ne with two arithmetic ops (eor and cbnz, unless the latter is somehow
> smarter). I don't think the condition flags usually need to be preserved
> across an asm statement, so the "cc" clobber probably didn't make much
> difference anyway.

I doubt you can measure it either way. The main reason for changing this
was for consistency with other, similar code and improved readability
(since otherwise we have a mystery "cc" clobber in the LSE version).

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-21 17:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-13  9:25 [PATCH 00/18] arm64: support for 8.1 LSE atomic instructions Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 01/18] arm64: cpufeature.h: add missing #include of kernel.h Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 02/18] arm64: atomics: move ll/sc atomics into separate header file Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 03/18] arm64: elf: advertise 8.1 atomic instructions as new hwcap Will Deacon
2015-07-17 13:48   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-17 13:57     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 04/18] arm64: alternatives: add cpu feature for lse atomics Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 05/18] arm64: introduce CONFIG_ARM64_LSE_ATOMICS as fallback to ll/sc atomics Will Deacon
2015-07-17 16:32   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-17 17:25     ` Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 06/18] arm64: atomics: patch in lse instructions when supported by the CPU Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 07/18] arm64: locks: " Will Deacon
2015-07-21 16:53   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-21 17:29     ` Will Deacon
2015-07-23 13:39       ` Will Deacon
2015-07-23 14:14         ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 08/18] arm64: bitops: " Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 09/18] arm64: xchg: " Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 10/18] arm64: cmpxchg: " Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 11/18] arm64: cmpxchg_dbl: " Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 12/18] arm64: cmpxchg: avoid "cc" clobber in ll/sc routines Will Deacon
2015-07-21 17:16   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-21 17:32     ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 13/18] arm64: cmpxchg: avoid memory barrier on comparison failure Will Deacon
2015-07-13 10:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-13 11:22     ` Will Deacon
2015-07-13 13:39       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-13 14:52         ` Will Deacon
2015-07-13 15:32           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-13 15:58             ` Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 14/18] arm64: atomics: tidy up common atomic{,64}_* macros Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 15/18] arm64: atomics: prefetch the destination word for write prior to stxr Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 16/18] arm64: atomics: implement atomic{, 64}_cmpxchg using cmpxchg Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 17/18] arm64: atomic64_dec_if_positive: fix incorrect branch condition Will Deacon
2015-07-13  9:25 ` [PATCH 18/18] arm64: kconfig: select HAVE_CMPXCHG_LOCAL Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150721173212.GP31095@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).