From: bhelgaas@google.com (Bjorn Helgaas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI: iproc: enable arm64 support for iProc PCIe
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:30:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150721203018.GH21967@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437021563-29139-2-git-send-email-rjui@broadcom.com>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 09:39:20PM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
> This patch enables arm64 support to the iProc PCIe driver
This needs a little more explanation: ARM has a common struct pci_sys_data
but ARM64 does not, and ARM needs pci_fixup_irqs() but ARM64 does not (why
not?), ARM uses the common pci_sys_data for the PCI sysdata while ARM64
uses a driver-specific sysdata, etc.
> Signed-off-by: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c | 15 ++++-----------
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h | 8 ++++++--
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
> index d77481e..8a556d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
> @@ -58,11 +58,6 @@
> #define SYS_RC_INTX_EN 0x330
> #define SYS_RC_INTX_MASK 0xf
>
> -static inline struct iproc_pcie *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> -{
> - return sys->private_data;
> -}
> -
> /**
> * Note access to the configuration registers are protected at the higher layer
> * by 'pci_lock' in drivers/pci/access.c
> @@ -71,8 +66,7 @@ static void __iomem *iproc_pcie_map_cfg_bus(struct pci_bus *bus,
> unsigned int devfn,
> int where)
> {
> - struct pci_sys_data *sys = bus->sysdata;
> - struct iproc_pcie *pcie = sys_to_pcie(sys);
> + struct iproc_pcie *pcie = bus->sysdata;
> unsigned slot = PCI_SLOT(devfn);
> unsigned fn = PCI_FUNC(devfn);
> unsigned busno = bus->number;
> @@ -208,10 +202,7 @@ int iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *res)
>
> iproc_pcie_reset(pcie);
>
> - pcie->sysdata.private_data = pcie;
> -
> - bus = pci_create_root_bus(pcie->dev, 0, &iproc_pcie_ops,
> - &pcie->sysdata, res);
> + bus = pci_create_root_bus(pcie->dev, 0, &iproc_pcie_ops, pcie, res);
> if (!bus) {
> dev_err(pcie->dev, "unable to create PCI root bus\n");
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -229,7 +220,9 @@ int iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *res)
>
> pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
> pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bus);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, pcie->map_irq);
> +#endif
> pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h
> index ba0a108..0ee9673 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h
> @@ -18,18 +18,22 @@
>
> /**
> * iProc PCIe device
> + * @sysdata: Per PCI controller data. This needs to be kept at the beginning of
> + * struct iproc_pcie, to enable support of both ARM32 and ARM64 platforms with
> + * minimal changes in the iProc PCIe core driver
> * @dev: pointer to device data structure
> * @base: PCIe host controller I/O register base
> * @resources: linked list of all PCI resources
> - * @sysdata: Per PCI controller data
> * @root_bus: pointer to root bus
> * @phy: optional PHY device that controls the Serdes
> * @irqs: interrupt IDs
> */
> struct iproc_pcie {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> + struct pci_sys_data sysdata;
> +#endif
I'm OK with adding #ifdefs to make this work on both ARM and ARM64. We can
at least see the ifdefs and know what needs to be fixed. I'm a little more
hesitant about adding code that depends on the position of sysdata within
struct iproc_pcie. I'd rather have something ugly and robust that cries
out for fixing than something minimal and fragile.
I see that your v1 patch added #ifdef CONFIG_ARM around sysdata at its
original location below, and you mentioned that you took Arnd's advice to
move sysdata to the beginning of the structure, but I don't see Arnd's
email on the list.
> struct device *dev;
> void __iomem *base;
> - struct pci_sys_data sysdata;
> struct pci_bus *root_bus;
> struct phy *phy;
> int irqs[IPROC_PCIE_MAX_NUM_IRQS];
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-21 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-16 4:39 [PATCH v3 0/4] Add Broadcom North Star 2 support Ray Jui
2015-07-16 4:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI: iproc: enable arm64 support for iProc PCIe Ray Jui
2015-07-21 20:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2015-07-21 20:50 ` Ray Jui
2015-07-21 21:04 ` Ray Jui
2015-07-21 22:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-22 0:01 ` Ray Jui
2015-07-16 4:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] PCI: iproc: Fix ARM64 dependency in Kconfig Ray Jui
2015-07-16 4:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: Add Broadcom iProc family support Ray Jui
2015-07-16 4:39 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: dts: Add Broadcom North Star 2 support Ray Jui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150721203018.GH21967@google.com \
--to=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).