From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com (=?utf-8?B?U8O2cmVu?= Brinkmann) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 07:50:27 -0700 Subject: [RFC 1/3] docs: dts: Added documentation for Xilinx Zynq PL Reset bindings. In-Reply-To: <55B1C1CB.2050402@xilinx.com> References: <1437691862-21312-1-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com> <1437691862-21312-2-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com> <55B1C1CB.2050402@xilinx.com> Message-ID: <20150724145027.GY2531@xsjsorenbubuntu> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 06:40AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > On 07/24/2015 12:51 AM, Moritz Fischer wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt | 13 +++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..ac4499e > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt > > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ > > +Xilinx Zynq PL Reset Manager > > I think there is no reason to be just PL specific. That was my first thought too. Why not model all the resets in the SLCR? S?ren