From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:27:58 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: sunxi: Add custom irq_domain_ops In-Reply-To: References: <1437396074-15791-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1437396074-15791-4-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20150727122758.GU2564@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:04:38PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Maxime Ripard > wrote: > > > The current interrupt parsing code was working by accident, because the > > default was actually parsing the first node of interrupts. > > > > While that was mostly working (and the flags were actually ignored), this > > binding has never been documented, and doesn't work with SoCs that have > > multiple interrupt banks anyway. > > > > Add a proper interrupt xlate function, that uses the same description than > > the GPIOs ( ), that will make things less confusing. > > > > The EINT number will still be used as the hwirq number, but won't be > > exposed through the DT. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard > > This patch does not apply to the pinctrl devel branch. > > Does it need to be rebased or do I need to merge in fixes? > > Holding patch 3/4 and 4/4 until this is resolved. I'll rebase and resend the last 2 patches. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: