From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: public_timo.s@silentcreek.de (public_timo.s at silentcreek.de)
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:36:53 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [linux-sunxi] [RFC] ARM: dts: sunxi: Add regulators and
 board-specific operating points for LeMaker BananaPi
In-Reply-To: <55B5E6DB.8020009@redhat.com>
References: <1437960486-2809-1-git-send-email-public_timo.s@silentcreek.de><55B5E6DB.8020009@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20150727123653.36C046C8007E@dd34104.kasserver.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi again,

one more thing...

Hans de Goede schrieb am 27.07.2015 10:07:
> IMHO we should just stick with the standard operating points unless we know
> that there are stability issues with them (such as e.g. on the A10 OlinuxIno
> Lime).

If we stick to the standard operating points, shouldn't we honor their voltages
as well? If we set the minimum voltage for dcdc2 to 1.0V (as you did) or 1.05V
(as I did), this means that the lowest operating point of 144MHz at 0.9V defined
in sun7i-a20.dtsi (and with my definition the 312MHz opp as well) will not be
available because cpufreq-dt simply ignores operating points that aren't within
the set voltage range for that regulator.


Regards,

Timo