From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 14:41:26 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v2] clk: exynos4: Fix wrong clock for Exynos4x12 ADC In-Reply-To: <55B472C7.5000109@gmail.com> References: <1434074005-18846-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <20150721224235.GA30021@codeaurora.org> <55AED88D.2060009@samsung.com> <55B472C7.5000109@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20150728214126.GA3159@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/26, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > On 07/22/2015 08:41 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >On 22.07.2015 07:42, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >>>On 06/12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > [...] > >>>>>Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > >>>>>Cc: > >>>>>Fixes: c63c57433003 ("ARM: dts: Add ADC's dt data to read raw data for exynos4x12") > >>>>>Link:https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/11/85 > >>> > >>>Did you want clk maintainers to apply this? The To: list is not > >>>helping so I'm not sure what's going on and it seems to have > >>>slipped through the cracks. > > > >Thank you for being proactive! I appreciate this. > >Some time ago Sylwester replied that he took care about this patch so I > >think this will go through Samsung clock tree. > > > >Sylwester, are you planning to send this as fix for 4.2-rc? > > I think it qualifies for 4.3, it's not a new regression and will be > backported to -stable anyway. > I would prefer clk maintainers have applied this, otherwise I would > need to make a (questionable) pull request with only one patch, since > all patches except this one after the last merge window were part > of bigger series touching multiple subsystems and applied through > the samsung soc tree. > Ok. Applied to clk-next. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project