From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:23:51 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 05/10] opp: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings In-Reply-To: <55B80A34.1010805@codeaurora.org> References: <1b5a393f2162752cbb773956dff15739e7525a1d.1434369079.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <2910042.ys2zsBBKt2@amdc1976> <20150727030239.GG19944@linux> <55B80A34.1010805@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <20150729065351.GA2502@linux> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 28-07-15, 16:03, Stephen Boyd wrote: > There is talk about moving to 64 bits for the frequency in the clk API. > It's not actively being developed though and I'm not sure when we'll get > there. From a DT perspective though, I don't see why it would be bad to > have two cells instead of one cell for the frequency here. It would > allow up to 64 bits of frequency so that when we change the clk API we > won't need to do anything in the OPP bindings to handle it. Just because > we have problems in the kernel doesn't mean we should put the same > problems into DT. Okay, I am going to send a patch for that as well and will respin the series again. -- viresh