From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bp@alien8.de (Borislav Petkov) Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:43:16 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] edac: Add L3/SoC support to the APM X-Gene SoC EDAC driver In-Reply-To: References: <1437808063-17592-1-git-send-email-lho@apm.com> <1437808063-17592-2-git-send-email-lho@apm.com> <1437808063-17592-3-git-send-email-lho@apm.com> <20150729142941.GC17367@nazgul.tnic> <20150730043148.GC7209@nazgul.tnic> Message-ID: <20150730074316.GB8984@nazgul.tnic> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:31:49PM -0700, Loc Ho wrote: > Let me clarify a bit. I have one top level driver node and multiple > instance of subnodes - 4 MC, 4 L2/L1, 1 L3C, and 1 SoC EDAC for now. > The L3C many be multiple instance in the future. Just a note, the way > EDAC looks up instance is by pointer of struct device. It doesn't need > anything more than that. That's not what I mean - I mean all those instances calling into the EDAC core concurrently without any locking. From a quick scan, nothing problematic sticks out but it needs careful auditing. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --