From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni)
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 23:27:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 23/23] clk: at91: Revert "keep slow clk enabled to
 prevent system hang"
In-Reply-To: <55BBE47F.3010307@codeaurora.org>
References: <1438335599-3301-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
 <1438335599-3301-24-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
 <55BBC5CC.80406@codeaurora.org> <20150731210905.GM27985@piout.net>
 <55BBE47F.3010307@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <20150731212724.GN27985@piout.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 31/07/2015 at 14:11:27 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote :
> On 07/31/2015 02:09 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >On 31/07/2015 at 12:00:28 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote :
> >>On 07/31/2015 02:39 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >>>-	clk_prepare_enable(slow_clk);
> >>>-
> >>>-	return 0;
> >>>-}
> >>>-arch_initcall(of_at91_clk_slow_retain);
> >>Can you drop the include of clk.h in this file too?
> >>
> >Sure! I will do that in v3. However, I'll wait for some feedback from
> >the other maintainers before sending again.
> >
> 
> Cool. Also, are you going to take this through arm-soc? If so, feel free to
> add my ack.
> 

Actually, clk.h has never been included in that file.

I was thinking you could take it once the other patch made it in each
subsystem. It is not urgent, it can probably skip one or two cycles.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com