public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Docs: dt: Add PCI MSI map bindings
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 19:14:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150806181453.GD6437@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR0301MB07486794749E499F71BDFCD287750@CY1PR0301MB0748.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>

[...]

> > +PCI root complex
> > +================
> > +
> > +Optional properties
> > +-------------------
> > +
> > +- msi-map: Maps a Requester ID to an MSI controller and associated
> > +  msi-specifier data. The property is an arbitrary number of tuples of
> > +  (rid-base,msi-controller,msi-base,length), where:
> > +
> > +  * rid-base is a single cell describing the first RID matched by the entry.
> > +
> > +  * msi-controller is a single phandle to an MSI controller
> > +
> > +  * msi-base is an msi-specifier describing the msi-specifier produced for the
> > +    first RID matched by the entry.
> > +
> > +  * length is a single cell describing how many consecutive RIDs are matched
> > +    following the rid-base.
> > +
> > +  Any RID r in the interval [rid-base, rid-base + length) is associated with
> > +  the listed msi-controller, with the msi-specifier (r - rid-base + msi-base).
> > +
> > +- msi-map-mask: A mask to be applied to each Requester ID prior to being mapped
> > +  to an msi-specifier per the msi-map property.
> 
> Can we extend the msi-map-mask definition to say:  "A mask value of 0x0 is valid
> and indicates that no RIDs are _currently_ mapped to any msi-specifier."

That would break a valid case of the mask being all zeroes.

Consider the case that all RIDs get mapped to a single msi-specifier;
the obvious way to write that is:

msi-map-mask = <0x0000>;
msi-map = <0x0000 &msi (msi-specifier) 1>;

In this case all RIDS are always mapped to the single msi-specifier.

> We have an SoC with a programmable hardware table in the PCI controller that maps
> requester ID to stream ID, so the overall msi-map (and iommu-map) definition fit
> into that scheme.  But, we would like to be able make the RID->stream-ID mapping
> decision _lazily_, in Linux, based on actual usage of PCI devices.

Dynamically programming the mapping is at odds to this binding. I don't
see how that can fit.

Why can the RID->SID mapping not be statically configured prior to
entering the OS?

Thanks,
Mark.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-06 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-23 16:52 [PATCH 0/3] Generic PCI MSI + IOMMU topology bindings Mark Rutland
2015-07-23 16:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] Docs: dt: add generic MSI bindings Mark Rutland
2015-07-23 18:26   ` David Daney
2015-07-24  7:04     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-27  8:02   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-27  9:46     ` Mark Rutland
2015-08-03 10:44       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-05 16:51   ` Mark Rutland
2015-08-06  7:56     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-24 10:17     ` Mark Rutland
2015-08-24 13:37       ` Rob Herring
2015-08-24 13:47         ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-23 16:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] Docs: dt: Add PCI MSI map bindings Mark Rutland
2015-07-24 23:27   ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2015-07-27  9:16     ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-27  8:16   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-04 22:33     ` David Daney
2015-09-07 18:05       ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-08 15:53         ` Stuart Yoder
2015-09-07 17:56     ` Mark Rutland
2015-08-05 16:39   ` Varun Sethi
2015-08-06 17:38     ` Mark Rutland
2015-08-08 15:06       ` Varun Sethi
     [not found]   ` <CALRxmdA32xiSX7DDKAJPLR8=bh_9j-6MN124u4KjYGRT8bAKNg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-08-05 19:53     ` Stuart Yoder
2015-08-06 18:14       ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-08-06 19:46         ` Stuart Yoder
2015-07-23 16:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] Docs: dt: add PCI IOMMU " Mark Rutland
2015-07-24 12:23   ` Robin Murphy
2015-07-24 13:26     ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150806181453.GD6437@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox