From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar)
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 09:21:56 +0530
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for
 Exynos4x12 platform
In-Reply-To: <20150807035018.GF6325@linux>
References: <1438868514-8814-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
 <015301d0d0a3$1396c900$3ac45b00$@kernel.org>
 <20150807035018.GF6325@linux>
Message-ID: <20150807035156.GG6325@linux>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Fixed Olof's email id..

On 07-08-15, 09:20, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Cc'ing Rafael again. Guys please don't miss him for any PM related
> stuff or use get_maintainers ..
> 
> Cc'ing Arnd/Olof as well to discuss the merge stuff..
> 
> On 07-08-15, 08:53, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > Depends on:
> > > - next-20150806 branch of linux-next kernel tree
> > > - "[PATCH V3 00/16] OPP: Add code to support operating-points-v2 bindings"
> > >   (http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg435408.html)
> > > 
> > BTW, hmm...how can we see this series in v4.3?...to be honest, I don't think it
> > can be done in v4.3 because of dependencies with PM / OPP series
> 
> That is merged by Rafael Yesterday. That is manageable 
> 
> > and previous
> > exynos CPU OPP series in each cross trees...maybe that's why you created based
> > on linux-next...any idea?
> 
> So there is no build dependency with OPP patches I hope, as its all
> about using the bindings defined by them. And so you don't need to
> depend on that.
> 
> You might have to rebase on the ARM tree to manage your conflicts. In
> this case you can rebase directly on ARM SoC branch which has your
> patches (rebase directly over the last patch instead of the whole
> branch) and make sure Olof knows about this and he doesn't update
> (i.e. rebase) his branch, which he might not anyway.
> 
> The whole idea is to keep a single sha-id for a commit. So you can
> rebase over the published material present in ARM-SoC ..
> 
> -- 
> viresh

-- 
viresh