[PATCH 0/8] misc: remove boundary checks from bin attr users

[PATCH 0/8] misc: remove boundary checks from bin attr users

[Vladimir Zapolskiy]

This change removes a number of redundant checks on bin attribute
client's side, the same checks are done by sysfs_kf_bin_read() or
sysfs_kf_bin_write() caller from fs/sysfs/file.c.

Note, drivers/misc/pch_phub.c and drivers/misc/c2port/core.c may be
updated in a similar way, however this task is not done due to more
complicated read()/write() callbacks.

No functional change, hopefully.

Vladimir Zapolskiy (8):
  misc: cxl: clean up afu_read_config()
  misc: ds1682: clean up ds1682_eeprom_read() and ds1682_eeprom_write()
  misc: eeprom: 93xx46: clean up eeprom_93xx46_bin_read/write
  misc: eeprom: clean up eeprom_read()
  misc: eeprom: max6875: clean up max6875_read()
  misc: eeprom: at24: clean up at24_bin_write()
  misc: eeprom: at25: move eeprom boundary checks to mem_read/mem_write
  misc: eeprom: sunxi_sid: clean up sid_read()

 drivers/misc/cxl/sysfs.c            |  7 +------
 drivers/misc/ds1682.c               | 12 ------------
 drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c          |  3 ---
 drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c          | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom.c        |  5 -----
 drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93xx46.c | 14 --------------
 drivers/misc/eeprom/max6875.c       |  6 ------
 drivers/misc/eeprom/sunxi_sid.c     |  5 -----
 8 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)

-- 
2.1.4

[PATCH 8/8] misc: eeprom: sunxi_sid: clean up sid_read()

[Vladimir Zapolskiy]

The change removes redundant sysfs binary file boundary checks, since
this task is already done on caller side in fs/sysfs/file.c

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/misc/eeprom/sunxi_sid.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/sunxi_sid.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/sunxi_sid.c
index 8385177..26ce99d 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/sunxi_sid.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/sunxi_sid.c
@@ -70,11 +70,6 @@ static ssize_t sid_read(struct file *fd, struct kobject *kobj,
 	pdev = to_platform_device(kobj_to_dev(kobj));
 	sid_data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 
-	if (pos < 0 || pos >= sid_data->keysize)
-		return 0;
-	if (size > sid_data->keysize - pos)
-		size = sid_data->keysize - pos;
-
 	for (i = 0; i < size; i++)
 		buf[i] = sunxi_sid_read_byte(sid_data, pos + i);
 
-- 
2.1.4

[PATCH 0/8] misc: remove boundary checks from bin attr users

[Wolfram Sang]

Vladimir,

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:18:22AM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> This change removes a number of redundant checks on bin attribute
> client's side, the same checks are done by sysfs_kf_bin_read() or
> sysfs_kf_bin_write() caller from fs/sysfs/file.c.
> 
> Note, drivers/misc/pch_phub.c and drivers/misc/c2port/core.c may be
> updated in a similar way, however this task is not done due to more
> complicated read()/write() callbacks.

Can you resend the patches which touch i2c drivers with me on cc? I'd
like to take care of them.

Thanks,

   Wolfram

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150807/fe9bc9a6/attachment.sig>

[PATCH 0/8] misc: remove boundary checks from bin attr users

[Vladimir Zapolskiy]

Hi Wolfram,

On 07.08.2015 19:10, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Vladimir,
> 
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:18:22AM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> This change removes a number of redundant checks on bin attribute
>> client's side, the same checks are done by sysfs_kf_bin_read() or
>> sysfs_kf_bin_write() caller from fs/sysfs/file.c.
>>
>> Note, drivers/misc/pch_phub.c and drivers/misc/c2port/core.c may be
>> updated in a similar way, however this task is not done due to more
>> complicated read()/write() callbacks.
> 
> Can you resend the patches which touch i2c drivers with me on cc? I'd
> like to take care of them.

if we're talking about this particular series, you should have them in
your mailbox, since you have them applied in wsa/i2c/for-next:

commit d12c0aaf3780c5b26b4ea9e795252381f586c063
Author: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Date:   Mon Jul 27 00:18:51 2015 +0300

    misc: eeprom: at24: clean up at24_bin_write()

    The change removes redundant sysfs binary file boundary check, since
    this task is already done on caller side in fs/sysfs/file.c

    Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
    Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>

commit 1f023297f7f77d434ecc221018d2e181eac0ae36
Author: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Date:   Mon Jul 27 00:16:31 2015 +0300

    i2c: slave eeprom: clean up sysfs bin attribute read()/write()

    The change removes redundant sysfs binary file boundary checks,
    since this task is already done on caller side in fs/sysfs/file.c

    Note, on file size overflow read() now returns 0, and this is a
    correct and expected EOF notification according to POSIX.

    Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
    Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>


Do you want me to send them to you again anyway?

--
With best wishes,
Vladimir

[PATCH 0/8] misc: remove boundary checks from bin attr users

[Wolfram Sang]

> if we're talking about this particular series, you should have them in
> your mailbox, since you have them applied in wsa/i2c/for-next:

Those are already in linus tree. I mean all drivers which use struct
i2c_driver. Or do you prefer they go via Greg? I am fine with both.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150808/6047f4e5/attachment.sig>

[PATCH 0/8] misc: remove boundary checks from bin attr users

[Vladimir Zapolskiy]

Hi Wolfram,

On 08.08.2015 01:34, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
>> if we're talking about this particular series, you should have them in
>> your mailbox, since you have them applied in wsa/i2c/for-next:
> 
> Those are already in linus tree. I mean all drivers which use struct
> i2c_driver. Or do you prefer they go via Greg? I am fine with both.
> 

I think you may find most of the changes applied by Greg into
misc/char-misc-next branch.

The only change from the series, which is not found in
misc/char-misc-next or i2c/for-next is related to at25 driver (IC is
sitting on SPI):

  https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/26/101

Change 8/8 for sunxi is outdated due to accepted NVMEM framework.

With best wishes,
Vladimir

[PATCH 0/8] misc: remove boundary checks from bin attr users

[Wolfram Sang]

On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 03:51:54PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
> 
> On 08.08.2015 01:34, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > 
> >> if we're talking about this particular series, you should have them in
> >> your mailbox, since you have them applied in wsa/i2c/for-next:
> > 
> > Those are already in linus tree. I mean all drivers which use struct
> > i2c_driver. Or do you prefer they go via Greg? I am fine with both.
> > 
> 
> I think you may find most of the changes applied by Greg into
> misc/char-misc-next branch.

Great, thanks for the heads up!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150808/e80cfbcb/attachment.sig>