From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:30:23 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt: power: st: Provide bindings for ST's OPPs In-Reply-To: <20150810132247.GH3249@x1> References: <1438010430-5802-2-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20150728022936.GB1229@linux> <20150728225510.GB3159@codeaurora.org> <20150729081403.GH2284@x1> <20150729221526.GE3159@codeaurora.org> <20150730084634.GD9319@x1> <20150731163715.GV3159@codeaurora.org> <20150803034642.GV899@linux> <20150810132247.GH3249@x1> Message-ID: <20150811080023.GB5509@linux> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10-08-15, 14:22, Lee Jones wrote: > > Optional properties: > > +- opp-cuts: One or more strings, describing the versions of hardware the OPPs > > + can support. > > This isn't very generic. > > I'm guessing some vendors my have quite a few ways to differentiate > between board versions/revisions/cuts etc. > > How about another array where a vendor can choose to identify a piece > of hardware however they see fit. > > Example 1 (simple version): > > /* Version 1 */ > opp-version = <1>; > > Example 2 (using the kernel's versioning): > > /* 2.6.32-rc1 */ > opp-version = <2 6 32 1>; > > Example 3 (using ST's versioning): > > /* Major 2, Minor 0, Cut 2, All substrates */ > opp-version = <2 0 2 0xff>; But how will we parse this with generic code ? -- viresh