From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jszhang@marvell.com (Jisheng Zhang) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:46:50 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: berlin: add a PWM node on the BG2 In-Reply-To: <55C900D0.9060606@gmail.com> References: <1438248201-29222-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <1438248201-29222-5-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <55C900D0.9060606@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20150811104650.0e19ba41@xhacker> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Dear Sebastian, On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:51:44 +0200 Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 30.07.2015 11:23, Antoine Tenart wrote: > > This patch adds a PWM node in the Berlin BG2 device tree, using the > > newly added Berlin PWM driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2.dtsi | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2.dtsi > > index ef811de09908..e17bd5faed27 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2.dtsi > > @@ -512,5 +512,11 @@ > > interrupts = ; > > }; > > }; > > + > > + pwm: pwm at f20000 { > > + compatible = "marvell,berlin-pwm"; > > + reg = <0xf20000 0x40>; > > + #pwm-cells = <3>; > > + }; > > I only checked berlin2.dtsi: > The top most line with belongs to a sub-node of > apb at fc0000 - which means that the pwm node isn't sorted in by > address. Please sort the nodes by address in all three DT patches. > > BTW, is there any IRQ from the PWM IP routed to any intc upstream? > A quick look into some BSP code does not reveal any hints maybe > one of the Marvell guys can comment on it. There's no interrupt for the PWM in all berlin SoCs ;) Thanks, Jisheng