From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:46:59 +0530 Subject: 3.18: lockdep problems in cpufreq In-Reply-To: <20150811170357.GA24529@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20141214213655.GA11285@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150518185645.GA28053@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <2574268.XBqpdL2VLI@vostro.rjw.lan> <20150811170357.GA24529@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20150812051659.GI32049@linux> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11-08-15, 18:03, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:05:55AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, May 18, 2015 07:56:45 PM Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 09:11:53AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > > On 16 December 2014 at 04:39, Russell King - ARM Linux > > > > wrote: > > > > > Well, here's a patch which I'm running on top of 3.18 at the moment, > > > > > which is basically what I described in my email, and I'm running with it > > > > > and it is without any lockdep complaint. > > > > > > > > We need two separate patches now, one for 3.18 and other one for 3.19-rc. > > > > 3.19 has see lots of changes in this particular file and so we need to > > > > change few things here. Was the patch for latest kernel ever circulated ? Probably that's why Eduardo never got back to it. -- viresh