From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:05:30 +0530 Subject: 3.18: lockdep problems in cpufreq In-Reply-To: <20150812072129.GD7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20141214213655.GA11285@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150518185645.GA28053@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <2574268.XBqpdL2VLI@vostro.rjw.lan> <20150811170357.GA24529@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150812051659.GI32049@linux> <20150812072129.GD7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20150812073530.GA16445@linux> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12-08-15, 08:21, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Maybe not - I often lose track of which patches are in what state - > tracking the state of 250+ patches over many months and in some cases > _years_ is not easy. I agree.. > That's still no reason for Eduardo to _completely_ ignore this thread, > especially when Rafael explicitly tried to get comment from Eduardo. Oh, no. I am not trying to be anybody's advocate here. I was just highlighting the point here, that I remembered. Even I was quite busy then and couldn't get back to it. Lets fix this now. I believe you have a patch for this based on latest kernel? Mind pasting that here for quick review? -- viresh