From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:15:51 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4 1/3] PCI: generic: remove dependency on hw_pci In-Reply-To: <20150804234956.GF17327@google.com> References: <1438721620-15493-1-git-send-email-jchandra@broadcom.com> <20150804234956.GF17327@google.com> Message-ID: <20150812091551.GA23483@red-moon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 12:49:56AM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 02:23:38AM +0530, Jayachandran C wrote: > > The current code in pci-host-generic.c uses pci_common_init_dev() > > from arm architecture to do some part of the PCI setup, and this > > prevents it from being used with arm64 architecture. > > > > The part of pci_common_init_dev() that is really needed by > > pci-host-generic.c is very limited and can be done in the same > > file without using hw_pci API of ARM. The ARM platform requires > > a pci_sys_data as sysdata for the PCI bus, this can be handled by > > setting up gen_pci to have a pci_sys_data variable as the first > > element. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jayachandran C > > Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi > > Tested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi > > Tested-by: Pavel Fedin > > I applied all three of these to my pci/enumeration branch for v4.3. > > I made a few changes, the most important being to call > pcie_bus_configure_settings() before pci_bus_add_devices(), because drivers > may claim devices in pci_bus_add_devices(), and the PCI core shouldn't > touch devices after drivers claim them. > > I dropped the acks and tested-by because of that change, but I'll happily > add them back if Lorenzo and Pavel confirm. The patches are here if you > want to review/test them: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git/log/?h=pci/enumeration > I am happy with your changes so you can certainly add my acked-by/tested-by tags back, with thanks. Thank you ! Lorenzo > I'm sure the other patches on that branch will need some tweaks, too, so I > don't have any problem with updating these.