From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:48:03 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] thermal: cpu_cooling: fix lockdep problems in cpu_cooling In-Reply-To: <20150812090811.GI7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20150812073530.GA16445@linux> <20150812081142.GB16445@linux> <20150812090811.GI7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20150812091803.GG16445@linux> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12-08-15, 10:08, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Possibly, had the code previously been like that. See: > > commit 2479bb6443d6a793f896219a34bfab0cc410f0b4 > Author: Viresh Kumar > Date: Thu Dec 4 09:42:04 2014 +0530 > > which post-dates this patch, and removes this "style" in favour of using > the broken list mechanism. Just to make sure I understand it properly, do you want to say that I added 2479bb6 patch after you reported this problem & your patch? If yes, then I don't see how my patch came after yours. Mine was written on 4/Dec/2014 and committed on 8/Dec/2014 and you first reported the problem on 14/Dec/2014. > Frankly... you don't have a leg to stand on I can accept that :) > because _you_ knew about this problem, and you saw my patch. So removing > something that my patch to fix a serious bug relied upon... I don't think I removed that stuff after your patch. > You know what? At this point, I'm just not going to bother. You fix > this lockdep problem, I'm obviously useless at kernel stuff. Okay, leave it on me. I will re-circulate your patch. -- viresh