From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: balbi@ti.com (Felipe Balbi) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:47:36 -0500 Subject: [PATCH-next 1/4] Revert "ARM: 7655/1: smp_twd: make twd_local_timer_of_register() no-op for nosmp" In-Reply-To: <20150813153707.GF7576@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1439409416-32673-1-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com> <1439409416-32673-2-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com> <20150813153707.GF7576@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20150813154736.GI27560@saruman.tx.rr.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 04:37:07PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 02:56:53PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > This reverts commit 904464b91eca8c665acea033489225af02eeb75a. > > > > The problem pointed out by commit 904464b91eca ("ARM: 7655/1: > > smp_twd: make twd_local_timer_of_register() no-op for nosmp") > > doesn't exist anymore. > > > > We can safely boot with nosmp and the warning won't show up. > > > > The other side benefit of this patch is that TWD has a chance > > to probe on single-core A9 systems such as AM437x which sport > > TWD. > > I don't remember all the details from Feb 2013 on why we made that > change. If this is proven safe, then I guess it's okay. Do you want me to upload to your patch system and, perhaps, keep in linux-next for v4.4 merge window ? (too late for v4.3 I guess). -- balbi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: