linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv4 3/6] dmaengine: mv_xor: remove support for dmacap,* DT properties
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 22:30:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150819170045.GK13546@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150727124405.53752fe2@free-electrons.com>

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:44:05PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Vinod,
> 
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:46:53 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> 
> > >  	xor01 {
> > >  	      interrupts = <52>;
> > > -	      dmacap,memcpy;
> > > -	      dmacap,xor;
> > > -	      dmacap,memset;
> > I maybe wrong but there was an assumption that DT properties, even if bad
> > are always there as they need to be treated as kernel ABI.
> > 
> > How will it work if someone has older DT implementation or older driver?
> 
> Supporting a new DT with an old kernel has never been part of the
> requirements of the DT ABI stability.
> 
> Supporting an old DT with a new kernel is the actual requirement. And
> the patch I'm proposing does not break this at all: a new kernel will
> simply ignore those dmacap,* properties from an old DT, and the driver
> automatically knows by itself what are the capabilities of the
> different XOR engines.
> 
> Therefore, there is no backward compatibility issue introduced by this
> patch.

Yes tht is correct

-- 
~Vinod

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-19 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-08 14:28 [PATCHv4 0/6] dmaengine: mv_xor fixes and improvements Thomas Petazzoni
2015-07-08 14:28 ` [PATCHv4 1/6] dmaengine: mv_xor: fix big endian operation in register mode Thomas Petazzoni
2015-07-22  5:22   ` Vinod Koul
2015-07-08 14:28 ` [PATCHv4 2/6] dmaengine: mv_xor: add suspend/resume support Thomas Petazzoni
2015-07-22  5:10   ` Vinod Koul
2015-07-29  9:34     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-08-19 16:53       ` Vinod Koul
2015-07-08 14:28 ` [PATCHv4 3/6] dmaengine: mv_xor: remove support for dmacap, * DT properties Thomas Petazzoni
2015-07-22  5:16   ` [PATCHv4 3/6] dmaengine: mv_xor: remove support for dmacap,* " Vinod Koul
2015-07-22  5:18     ` Vinod Koul
2015-07-27 10:44     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-08-19 17:00       ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2015-08-19 17:02   ` Vinod Koul
2015-07-08 14:28 ` [PATCHv4 4/6] dmaengine: mv_xor: remove mv_xor_chan->current_type field Thomas Petazzoni
2015-08-19 17:04   ` Vinod Koul
2015-07-08 14:28 ` [PATCHv4 5/6] dmaengine: mv_xor: de-duplicate mv_chan_set_mode*() Thomas Petazzoni
2015-08-19 17:05   ` Vinod Koul
2015-07-08 14:28 ` [PATCHv4 6/6] dmaengine: mv_xor: optimize performance by using a subset of the XOR channels Thomas Petazzoni
2015-08-19 17:05   ` Vinod Koul
2015-07-08 15:37 ` [PATCHv4 0/6] dmaengine: mv_xor fixes and improvements Andrew Lunn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150819170045.GK13546@localhost \
    --to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).