From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mingo@kernel.org (Ingo Molnar) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 12:09:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/2] x86/KASAN updates for 4.3 In-Reply-To: <20150813172310.GK10280@arm.com> References: <1439444244-26057-1-git-send-email-ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> <20150813065040.GA17983@gmail.com> <20150813081641.GA14402@gmail.com> <20150813090119.GA10280@arm.com> <20150813112428.GG10280@arm.com> <20150813172310.GK10280@arm.com> Message-ID: <20150822100922.GA25039@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:24:28PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:02:26PM +0100, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: > > > 2015-08-13 12:01 GMT+03:00 Will Deacon : > > > > Yes please, works for me! If we're targetting 4.3, then please can you base > > > > on 4.2-rc4, as that's what our current arm64 queue is using? > > > > > > > > > > Does this mean that we are targeting arm64 part for 4.3 too? > > > > It depends on how well it merges with our current queue and whether it > > holds up to regression testing. The patches have been reviewed, so I'm > > comfortable with the content, but we're not at a stage where we can debug > > and fix any failures that might crop up from the merge. > > Scratch that :( > > I tried this out under EFI and it dies horribly in the stub code because > we're missing at least one KASAN_SANITIZE_ Makefile entry. > > So I think this needs longer to stew before hitting mainline. By all means > get the x86 dependencies in for 4.3, but the arm64 port can probably use > another cycle to iron out the bugs. Is there any known problem with the two patches in this series, or can I apply them? Thanks, Ingo