From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Add support for hardware updates of the access and dirty pte bits
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:07:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150910100753.GE12294@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55F06A87.3000204@citrix.com>
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 06:21:11PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> I've tried to boot the latest linus/master (a794b4f) which include this
> patch as DOM0 on xgene. This is failing late in the boot with
> a BUG (see trace below).
>
> The bisector pointed me to this patch. When I disable
> CONFIG_ARM64_HW_AFDBM, I'm able to boot the kernel and use it
> without any issue.
>
> Although, I'm not sure to understand how this patch could
> possibly break the filesystem subsystem.
I don't understand either. It seems that the kernel raises a BUG on
!PagePrivate but this patch never touches the page structure, only ptes.
I recall to have tested it on XGene but I can try it again (bare metal).
Is the bare metal error for you the same?
> Do you have any insight for debugging this problem?
[...]
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> > index 39139a3aa16d..a8be513dff6f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> > @@ -196,6 +196,19 @@ ENTRY(__cpu_setup)
> > */
> > mrs x9, ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1
> > bfi x10, x9, #32, #3
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_HW_AFDBM
> > + /*
> > + * Hardware update of the Access and Dirty bits.
> > + */
> > + mrs x9, ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1
> > + and x9, x9, #0xf
> > + cbz x9, 2f
> > + cmp x9, #2
> > + b.lt 1f
> > + orr x10, x10, #TCR_HD // hardware Dirty flag update
> > +1: orr x10, x10, #TCR_HA // hardware Access flag update
> > +2:
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_HW_AFDBM */
> > msr tcr_el1, x10
> > ret // return to head.S
> > ENDPROC(__cpu_setup)
Just in case some ID registers are wrong, can you do an "#if 0" above
instead of CONFIG_ARM64_HW_AFDBM?
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-10 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-10 16:24 [PATCH] arm64: Add support for hardware updates of the access and dirty pte bits Catalin Marinas
2015-09-09 17:21 ` Julien Grall
2015-09-09 18:22 ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-09 18:27 ` Julien Grall
2015-09-10 10:07 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2015-09-10 10:41 ` Will Deacon
2015-09-10 14:45 ` Julien Grall
2015-09-10 14:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-10 15:10 ` Julien Grall
2015-09-10 15:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-10 15:38 ` Will Deacon
2015-09-11 15:43 ` Julien Grall
2015-09-10 13:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-10 14:29 ` Julien Grall
2015-09-10 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-10 14:58 ` Julien Grall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150910100753.GE12294@localhost \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).