From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com (Bjorn Andersson) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:26:16 -0700 Subject: [Patch v2] firmware: qcom: scm: Add function stubs for ARM64 In-Reply-To: <1442005276-31971-1-git-send-email-agross@codeaurora.org> References: <1442005276-31971-1-git-send-email-agross@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <20150911232616.GE13472@usrtlx11787.corpusers.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri 11 Sep 14:01 PDT 2015, Andy Gross wrote: > This patch adds stubs for the SCM functions exposed in the QCOM SCM API. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Gross > --- > drivers/firmware/Kconfig | 8 +++++ > drivers/firmware/Makefile | 3 +- > drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/Kconfig b/drivers/firmware/Kconfig > index 99c69a3..72720eb 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/firmware/Kconfig > @@ -136,6 +136,14 @@ config QCOM_SCM > bool > depends on ARM || ARM64 > > +config QCOM_SCM_32 > + def_bool y > + depends on QCOM_SCM && ARM > + > +config QCOM_SCM_64 > + def_bool y > + depends on QCOM_SCM && ARM64 > + So if QCOM_SCM is selected by a consumer then the dependencies here will be met and the correct implementation will be chosen, as these aren't possible to deselect? I guess that's an okay approach, so: Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson Regards, Bjorn