From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: computersforpeace@gmail.com (Brian Norris)
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:29:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] ARM: brcmstb: mask GIC IRQs on suspend
In-Reply-To: <55F482BC.4050202@gmail.com>
References: <1434672696-13632-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com>
 <1434672696-13632-7-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com>
 <55F482BC.4050202@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150914172915.GN11487@google.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:53:32PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Le 06/18/15 17:11, Brian Norris a ?crit :
> > Lazily-masked IRQs can cause system suspend problems (e.g., spurious
> > wakeups from WFI), so we need to be sure non-wakeup GIC interrupts get
> > masked, not just disabled, during system suspend.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
> 
> Dropped this patch, no longer needed as of 4.3-rc0 with

Ooh, rc0! I didn't know we started doing sane numbering :)

> aec89ef72ba6c94420f599dcb684ed66937cdacf ("irqchip/gic: Enable
> SKIP_SET_WAKE and MASK_ON_SUSPEND")

Nice! I was wanting this done for a while, but I believe this approach
was rejected a few times before. Glad Sudeep dug to the bottom of the
issue to argue *why* that's the right thing to do.

Brian