From: shawnguo@kernel.org (Shawn Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 2/2] ARM: imx: support suspend states on imx7D
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 09:12:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150919011247.GD3770@tiger> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR0301MB0843D4E46210525521F9453483590@CY1PR0301MB0843.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 02:38:39PM +0000, Shenwei Wang wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shawn Guo [mailto:shawnguo at kernel.org]
> > Sent: 2015?9?18? 9:15
> > To: Wang Shenwei-B38339
> > Cc: jason at lakedaemon.net; Huang Yongcai-B20788;
> > linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; kernel at pengutronix.de; Sudeep Holla;
> > tglx at linutronix.de; shawn.guo at linaro.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] ARM: imx: support suspend states on imx7D
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 03:01:07PM +0000, Shenwei Wang wrote:
> > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile | 2 +
> > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h | 4 +
> > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx7.c | 917
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/suspend-imx7.S | 529 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > 5 files changed, 1453 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > 1453 lines addition to kernel only for i.MX7D suspend support. Yes,
> > > > this is the way we support suspend on i.MX6, but that's enough, and
> > > > we have to stop this somewhere. I would ask you to take Sudeep's
> > > > comment and adopt PSCI for i.MX7D power management.
> > >
> > > According to PSCI spec, a supervisory software must be implemented
> > > under either
> > > HVC(EL2) or SMC(EL3) privilege level. I agree that, with this idea, we
> > > could finally move these 1453 lines of codes from kernel into a
> > > platform specific firmware. The problem is we don't have the firmware
> > > so far, and we haven't even had a plan to enable the hypervisor or
> > > secure software on this platform. Because low power consumption is the
> > > key feature of this i.MX7D platform, please continue to consider the current
> > implementation and get this feature supported first.
> >
> > Can't U-Boot be considered as a firmware to implement PSCI? I have seen an
> > initial ARMv7 PSCI core support for U-Boot added by Marc Zyngier.
>
> The current PSCI support in uboot is not complete. It can now support cpuidle, shutdown,
> and reset. But to support system suspend, there would be a lot more tasks. For example,
> even the current wakeup source management codes will have to move into the firmware
> too. It is not a short time task. Please continue to consider this platform dependent implementation
> first, meanwhile, we will start to migrate the solution to PSCI. However it will take some time.
I have zero interest to maintain this pile of code in the mainline
kernel. Take it as a motivation to move to PSCI soon, or you maintain
it on your own as a out-of-tree patch for whatever long time you like.
Shawn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-19 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-31 21:33 [PATCH v8 0/2] IMX GPCv2 drivers for wakeup source and suspend Shenwei Wang
2015-07-31 21:33 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] irqchip: imx-gpcv2: IMX GPCv2 driver for wakeup sources Shenwei Wang
2015-08-21 13:45 ` Shenwei Wang
2015-08-23 10:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-24 16:09 ` Shenwei Wang
2015-08-24 17:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-24 18:25 ` Shenwei Wang
2015-08-24 18:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-31 21:33 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] ARM: imx: support suspend states on imx7D Shenwei Wang
2015-08-21 13:45 ` Shenwei Wang
2015-09-03 20:41 ` Shenwei Wang
2015-09-07 15:11 ` Shawn Guo
2015-09-08 15:01 ` Shenwei Wang
2015-09-18 14:15 ` Shawn Guo
2015-09-18 14:38 ` Shenwei Wang
2015-09-19 1:12 ` Shawn Guo [this message]
2015-10-01 16:31 ` Zhi Li
2015-10-08 6:37 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150919011247.GD3770@tiger \
--to=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).