From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:47:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm: wire up userfaultfd and membarrier syscalls In-Reply-To: <56013154.1010401@arm.com> References: <1442854833-10592-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20150921171715.GR21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <56013154.1010401@arm.com> Message-ID: <20150922104755.GW21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:45:40AM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi Russell, > > On 21/09/15 18:17, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 06:00:33PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > >> Add the syscall numbers to the ARM syscall table. Both have > >> been briefly tested using the provided selftests from the tools > >> directory. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > >> --- > >> Hi Russell, > >> > >> I saw that Thierry sent something similar beginning of August already > >> (which is now outdated), is there any issue with enabling syscalls? > > > > The only issue there is is that this was mentioned last week, and I > > replied about it last week. > > I missed that because I only looked in the ARM kernel ML, sorry about that. > > > I already have a patch pending for it, but I've been unable to merge > > it into mainline as my tree became somewhat messy due to the fixes > > missing -rc1 - which meant that my fixes branch was not recent enough > > to take that patch. Now that those fixes are in, I can now start > > sorting my tree out, as I'd normally do after -rc1. > > Fair enough and sorry for the noise. It should be in tonights linux-next. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.