From: ludovic.desroches@atmel.com (Ludovic Desroches)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] irqchip: atmel-aic5: fix bug with mask/unmask
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:07:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150922140703.GC28781@odux.rfo.atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509221549420.5606@nanos>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 03:50:30PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:27:08 +0200 (CEST)
> > Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > > Why is this locking dgc->gc[0] and fiddling with some other generic
> > > chip?
> >
> > Actually, we always access the same set of registers for all irqs of the
> > domain, and thus need to take the same lock (I chose the one contained
> > in the first generic irqchip, but I guess it could work with the others
> > too, as long as we always take the same one) before accessing them
> > because the configuration is done in two steps:
> >
> > 1/ specify the irq line you want to configure
> > 2/ set the new configuration
> >
> > Regarding register accesses, all generic chips are configured to
> > point to the same registers, so accessing them from the 'base' generic
> > chip or from the generic chip attached to the irq_data struct is the
> > same, though I agree that using bgc would add some consistency to the
> > implementation.
>
> Fair enough. It just deserves a comment for the casual reader.
>
Thanks for the addition of the comment.
Ludovic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-22 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-21 13:46 [PATCH 1/3] irqchip: atmel-aic5: fix bug with mask/unmask Ludovic Desroches
2015-09-21 13:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] irqchip: atmel-aic5: fix variable naming Ludovic Desroches
2015-09-22 8:27 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-09-21 13:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] irqchip: atmel-aic5: simplify base chip selection Ludovic Desroches
2015-09-22 8:27 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-09-22 7:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] irqchip: atmel-aic5: fix bug with mask/unmask Boris Brezillon
2015-09-22 8:27 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-09-22 10:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-22 11:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-09-22 13:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-22 14:07 ` Ludovic Desroches [this message]
[not found] ` <tip-478cc7b33413a4ad50852239d931d55e622f1cde@git.kernel.org>
2015-09-22 10:37 ` [tip:irq/urgent] irqchip/atmel-aic5: Use proper mask cache in mask/unmask() Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150922140703.GC28781@odux.rfo.atmel.com \
--to=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).