From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] dma-debug: Allow poisoning nonzero allocations
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 13:44:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150925124447.GO21513@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0405c6131def5aa179ff4ba5d4201ebde89cede3.1443178314.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 01:15:46PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Since some dma_alloc_coherent implementations return a zeroed buffer
> regardless of whether __GFP_ZERO is passed, there exist drivers which
> are implicitly dependent on this and pass otherwise uninitialised
> buffers to hardware. This can lead to subtle and awkward-to-debug issues
> using those drivers on different platforms, where nonzero uninitialised
> junk may for instance occasionally look like a valid command which
> causes the hardware to start misbehaving. To help with debugging such
> issues, add the option to make uninitialised buffers much more obvious.
The reason people started to do this is to stop a security leak in the
ALSA code: ALSA allocates the ring buffer with dma_alloc_coherent()
which used to grab pages and return them uninitialised. These pages
could contain anything - including the contents of /etc/shadow, or
your bank details.
ALSA then lets userspace mmap() that memory, which means any user process
which has access to the sound devices can read data leaked from kernel
memory.
I think I did bring it up at the time I found it, and decided that the
safest thing to do was to always return an initialised buffer - short of
constantly auditing every dma_alloc_coherent() user which also mmap()s
the buffer into userspace, I couldn't convince myself that it was safe
to avoid initialising the buffer.
I don't know whether the original problem still exists in ALSA or not,
but I do know that there are dma_alloc_coherent() implementations out
there which do not initialise prior to returning memory.
> diff --git a/lib/dma-debug.c b/lib/dma-debug.c
> index 908fb35..40514ed 100644
> --- a/lib/dma-debug.c
> +++ b/lib/dma-debug.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/ctype.h>
> #include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/poison.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> #include <asm/sections.h>
> @@ -1447,7 +1448,7 @@ void debug_dma_unmap_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sglist,
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(debug_dma_unmap_sg);
>
> void debug_dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> - dma_addr_t dma_addr, void *virt)
> + dma_addr_t dma_addr, void *virt, gfp_t flags)
> {
> struct dma_debug_entry *entry;
>
> @@ -1457,6 +1458,9 @@ void debug_dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> if (unlikely(virt == NULL))
> return;
>
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG_POISON) && !(flags & __GFP_ZERO))
> + memset(virt, DMA_ALLOC_POISON, size);
> +
This is likely to be slow in the case of non-cached memory and large
allocations. The config option should come with a warning.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-25 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-25 12:15 [PATCH 0/4] Assorted DMA mapping tweaks Robin Murphy
2015-09-25 12:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] dmapool: Fix overflow condition in pool_find_page Robin Murphy
2015-09-25 12:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] dma-mapping: Tidy up dma_parms default handling Robin Murphy
2015-09-25 12:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] dma-debug: Check nents in dma_sync_sg* Robin Murphy
2015-09-25 12:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] dma-debug: Allow poisoning nonzero allocations Robin Murphy
2015-09-25 12:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-09-25 17:35 ` Robin Murphy
2015-09-29 21:27 ` Andrew Morton
2015-10-07 19:17 ` Robin Murphy
2015-10-07 19:33 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150925124447.GO21513@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).