From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: balbi@ti.com (Felipe Balbi) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:43:39 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 15/16] usb: gadget: atmel: access the PMC using regmap In-Reply-To: <560C1027.9060100@atmel.com> References: <1443629469-15086-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <1443629469-15086-16-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <20150930163102.GM32625@saruman.tx.rr.com> <560C1027.9060100@atmel.com> Message-ID: <20150930164339.GQ32625@saruman.tx.rr.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 06:39:03PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Le 30/09/2015 18:31, Felipe Balbi a ?crit : > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 06:11:08PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > >> Use regmap to access the PMC to avoid using at91_pmc_read and > >> at91_pmc_write. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni > > > > can I take this through my tree or does it have any dependences with the rest of > > the series ? > > Hi Felipe, > > Well, I have the feeling that these changes would require the regmap to > be in place before using it. So yes, it has a strong dependency with the > rest of the series (and DT modifications like the 06/16 patch actually). > > So, I think that Alexandre would agree with me that we should take the > whole series with us through the arm-soc tree. An alternative would be > to delay the inclusion of the USB part a little bit... > > Thanks for the heads-up Felipe, Bye, hey no problem. I have no objections to $subject: Acked-by: Felipe Balbi -- balbi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: