From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:58:06 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: OMAP: dmtimer: check for fixed timers during config In-Reply-To: <5612A88E.1040809@ti.com> References: <201510040126.SfMisWv2%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <5612A88E.1040809@ti.com> Message-ID: <20151005165806.GE23801@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Suman Anna [151005 09:47]: > Tony, > > On 10/03/2015 12:29 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: > > Hi Suman, > > > > [auto build test results on v4.3-rc3 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore] > > > > config: arm-omap1_defconfig (attached as .config) > > reproduce: > > wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > > make.cross ARCH=arm > > > > All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c: In function 'omap_dm_timer_set_source': > >>> arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c:509:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'clk_hw_get_num_parents' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > if (!clk_hw_get_num_parents(__clk_get_hw(timer->fclk))) > > ^ > >>> arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c:509:2: error: implicit declaration of function '__clk_get_hw' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > > > vim +/clk_hw_get_num_parents +509 arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c > > > > 503 return pdata->set_timer_src(timer->pdev, source); > > 504 > > 505 if (IS_ERR(timer->fclk)) > > 506 return -EINVAL; > > 507 > > 508 /* Check if the clock has parents if not no point checking */ > > > 509 if (!clk_hw_get_num_parents(__clk_get_hw(timer->fclk))) > > 510 return 0; > > CONFIG_COMMON_CLK is not defined for OMAP1. So, are you ok if I enclose > this within #ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK? Yes, or maybe you can just clk_get_rate() on the 32k oscillator? Boards with no 32k oscillator should set the rate for that 0 zero. Regards, Tony