From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:13:22 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: porter: add SDHI0/2 DT support In-Reply-To: <561573D8.6060203@cogentembedded.com> References: <2228837.DO5U5OvRSi@wasted.cogentembedded.com> <20151007033957.GA30650@verge.net.au> <561573D8.6060203@cogentembedded.com> Message-ID: <20151008021322.GE8756@verge.net.au> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:34:48PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > On 10/07/2015 06:39 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > >>Define the Porter board dependent part of the SDHI0/2 device nodes along with > >>the necessary voltage regulators (note that the Vcc regulators are dummy -- > >>they are required but don't actually exist on the board). Also, GPIOs have to > >>be used for the CD and WP signals due to the SDHI driver constraints... > >> > >>This patch is analogous to the commit 1299df03d719 (ARM: shmobile: henninger: > >>add SDHI0/2 DT support) as there are no differences between those boards in > >>this respect. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov > >> > >>--- > >>This patch is against the 'renesas-devel-20151006-v4.3-rc4' tag of Simon > >>Horman's 'renesas.git' repo. > > > >Thanks I have queued this up after addressing some issues > >in the changelog that checkpatch complained about: > > >* text > 75 characters wide > >* Missing '"' around name of patch referred to > > Sorry about that, forgot to run thru checkpatch.pl (as usual :-). No harm done.