From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: l.majewski@samsung.com (Lukasz Majewski) Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 14:07:16 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] thermal: exynos: fix register read in TMU In-Reply-To: References: <1443699599-9693-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> <20151001141243.GA5061@sudip-pc> <20151008142129.GC10587@sudip-pc> Message-ID: <20151009140716.0c6e57b7@amdc2363> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Krzysztof, > 2015-10-08 23:21 GMT+09:00 Sudip Mukherjee > : > > On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 08:43:52AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> 2015-10-01 23:12 GMT+09:00 Sudip Mukherjee > >> : > >> > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:18:57PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski > >> > wrote: > >> >> 2015-10-01 20:39 GMT+09:00 Sudip Mukherjee > >> >> : > >> >> > The value of emul_con was getting overwritten if the selected > >> >> > soc is SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260. And so as a result we were > >> >> > reading from the wrong register in the case of > >> >> > SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260. > >> >> > >> >> How the value is overwritten if the soc is Exynos5260? I can't > >> >> see it (although the "else if" is still more obvious than "if" > >> >> but how does the description match the code?). > >> > The code here is: > >> > if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260) > >> > emul_con = EXYNOS5260_EMUL_CON; > >> > if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433) > >> > emul_con = EXYNOS5433_TMU_EMUL_CON; > >> > else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7) > >> > emul_con = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_EMUL_CON; > >> > else > >> > emul_con = EXYNOS_EMUL_CON; > >> > > >> > So if data->soc is SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260 , then emul_con becomes > >> > EXYNOS5260_EMUL_CON. But again for the else part it will become > >> > EXYNOS_EMUL_CON. > >> > >> Indeed! > >> > >> Fixes: 488c7455d74c ("thermal: exynos: Add the support for > >> Exynos5433 TMU") > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > > > Hi Krzysztof, > > Who will pick this one up? I still do not see it in linux-next. > > Hi! > > I guess it is a patch for Lukasz. > > Lukasz, > Do you plan to pick it up or maybe this should go through samsung-soc > tree? This is the only one patch, which is waiting in my queue. Since no more fixes available, please feel free to grab this patch to samsung-soc. Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski > > Best regards, > Krzysztof -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group