From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:07:37 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/7] arm64: relax Image placement rules
In-Reply-To: <1442968663-31843-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
References: <1442968663-31843-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20151013170737.GF11573@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:37:36PM -0700, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> This is a followup to the "arm64: update/clarify/relax Image and FDT placement
> rules" series I sent a while ago:
> (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/407148)
> 
> This has now been split in two series: this second series deals with the
> physical and virtual placement of the kernel Image.

Quick question, to refresh my memory: if this is the second series,
what is the first series?

Thanks.

-- 
Catalin