From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul)
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 20:18:14 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 10/13] dmaengine: ti-dma-crossbar: Add support for
 crossbar on AM33xx/AM43xx
In-Reply-To: <1444828344-21378-11-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
References: <1444828344-21378-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
 <1444828344-21378-11-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Message-ID: <20151014144814.GW27370@localhost>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 04:12:21PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> The DMA event crossbar on AM33xx/AM43xx is different from the one found in
> DRA7x family.
> Instead of a single event crossbar it has 64 identical mux attached to each
> eDMA event line. When the 0 event mux is selected, the default mapped event
> is going to be routed to the corresponding eDMA event line. If different
> mux is selected, then the selected event is going to be routed to the given
> eDMA event.

Why is crossbar patch in edma series?

> +static void ti_am335x_xbar_free(struct device *dev, void *route_data)
> +{
> +	struct ti_am335x_xbar_data *xbar = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct ti_am335x_xbar_map *map = route_data;
> +
> +	dev_err(dev, "Unmapping XBAR event %u on channel %u\n",
> +		map->mux_val, map->dma_line);

Err ?

-- 
~Vinod