From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:58:20 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v11 1/8] arm64: renesas: r8a7795: Add Renesas R8A7795 SoC support In-Reply-To: <1444890243-6978-2-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> References: <1444890243-6978-1-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> <1444890243-6978-2-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Message-ID: <20151015105820.GF8825@leverpostej> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, > > + gic: interrupt-controller at 0xf1010000 { > + compatible = "arm,gic-400"; > + #interrupt-cells = <3>; > + #address-cells = <0>; > + interrupt-controller; > + reg = <0x0 0xf1010000 0 0x1000>, > + <0x0 0xf1020000 0 0x2000>; > + interrupts = + (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>; > + }; No GICH and GICV? Which exception level do CPUs boot at? > + clock { > + #address-cells = <2>; > + #size-cells = <2>; > + #clock-cells = <1>; > + ranges; > + > + cpg_clocks: cpg_clocks at e6150000 { > + compatible = "renesas,r8a7795-cpg-clocks", > + "renesas,rcar-gen3-cpg-clocks"; > + reg = <0 0xe6150000 0 0x1000>; > + clocks = <&extal_clk>; > + clock-indices = < > + R8A7795_CLK_MAIN R8A7795_CLK_PLL0 > + R8A7795_CLK_PLL1 R8A7795_CLK_PLL2 > + R8A7795_CLK_PLL3 R8A7795_CLK_PLL4 > + >; > + clock-output-names = "main", "pll0", "pll1", > + "pll2", "pll3", "pll4"; > + #power-domain-cells = <0>; > + }; > + }; This clock node makes no sense. It's not compatible with anything and doesn't provide clocks itself, so #clock-cells is meaningless, and nothing underneath it is guaranteed to be probed. Please get rid of the clock node. It is a cargo-culted piece of magic that shouldn't exist. Also, cpg_clocks node is missing #clock-cells, given it has clock-output-names I assume it is itself a clock provider, and presumably should have #clock-cells = <1>. Thanks, Mark.