From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:54:56 -0700 Subject: [PATCH V3 5/6] clk: qoriq: Add ls1043a support. In-Reply-To: <1444870621.5185.223.camel@freescale.com> References: <1444822498-16477-1-git-send-email-B48286@freescale.com> <1444822498-16477-6-git-send-email-B48286@freescale.com> <20151014183113.GE26883@codeaurora.org> <1444870621.5185.223.camel@freescale.com> Message-ID: <20151015195456.GT4558@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/14, Scott Wood wrote: > On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 11:31 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 10/14, Zhiqiang Hou wrote: > > > From: Hou Zhiqiang > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang > > > --- > > > > Acked-by: Stephen Boyd > > > > Could you ack my clock patchset that this depends on (if there are no > > objections)? Mike Turquette acked the RFC version a while back, but it's > > changed a bit since then (including the new clk_get_num_parents() and > > clk_get_parent_by_index() -- I CCed Russell King on that but got no > > response), and got no response when I asked whether the ack was still good > > for v3. > > Done. The consumer APIs look ok too, but I'd like to see if Russell has any comments. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project