From: christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFT - PATCH v2 0/2] KVM/arm64: add fp/simd lazy switch support
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 23:07:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151018210738.GF7531@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561BDFE3.5060403@samsung.com>
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 09:29:23AM -0700, Mario Smarduch wrote:
> Hi Christoffer, Marc -
> I just threw this test your way without any explanation.
I'm confused. Did you send me something somewhere already?
>
> The test loops, does fp arithmetic and checks the truncated result.
> It could be a little more dynamic have an initial run to
> get the sum to compare against while looping, different fp
> hardware may come up with a different sum, but truncation is
> to 5'th decimal point.
>
> The rationale is that if there is any fp/simd corruption
> one of these runs should fail. I think most likely scenario
> for that is a world switch in midst of fp operation. I've
> instrumented (basically add some tracing to vcpu_put()) and
> validated vcpu_put gets called thousands of time (for v7,v8)
> for an over night test running two guests/host crunching
> fp operations.
>
> Other then that not sure how to really catch any problems
> with the patches applied. Obviously this is a huge issues, if this has
> any problems. If you or Marc have any other ideas I'd be happy
> to enhance the test.
I think it's important to run two VMs at the same time, each with some
floating-point work, and then run some floating point on the host at the
same time.
You can make that even more interesting by doing 32-bit guests at the
same time as well.
I believe Marc was running Panranoia
(http://www.netlib.org/paranoia/paranoia.c) to test the last lazy
series.
Thanks,
-Christoffer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-18 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-22 23:34 [RFT - PATCH v2 0/2] KVM/arm64: add fp/simd lazy switch support Mario Smarduch
2015-09-22 23:34 ` [RFT - PATCH v2 1/2] add hooks for armv8 fp/simd lazy switch Mario Smarduch
2015-09-22 23:34 ` [RFT - PATCH v2 2/2] enable " Mario Smarduch
2015-10-05 15:45 ` [RFT - PATCH v2 0/2] KVM/arm64: add fp/simd lazy switch support Christoffer Dall
2015-10-05 16:14 ` Mario Smarduch
2015-10-05 17:25 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-10-05 18:23 ` Mario Smarduch
2015-10-12 16:29 ` Mario Smarduch
2015-10-18 21:07 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2015-10-19 22:06 ` Mario Smarduch
2015-10-20 7:21 ` Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151018210738.GF7531@cbox \
--to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).