From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: andi.shyti@samsung.com (Andi Shyti)
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:20:47 +0900
Subject: [PATCH v4 6/8] drivers: soc: add support for exynos SROM driver
In-Reply-To: <014301d10b01$488873f0$d9995bd0$@samsung.com>
References: <1445255206-11148-1-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
 <1445255206-11148-7-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
 <56258683.7070204@samsung.com> <5625B92C.10505@samsung.com>
 <5625C07D.4030706@samsung.com> <014301d10b01$488873f0$d9995bd0$@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <20151020082047.GA923@samsunx.samsung>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Pavel,

> > AFAIR Fedin was talking about missing functionality, not about adding
> > the contribution by himself. So he might add it or he might not. I did
> > not receive any commitments from him.
> 
>  I am waiting for the driver to be integrated, because i see it's constantly redesigned. Then i'll post my patches. By the way, they
> will be useful only if pin controller driver for 5410 is accepted upstream, several authors have done it but i still didn't see it
> in upstream.
>  Pin controller is needed in order to configure multi-functional pins correctly.
> 
> > The driver should be "proper" for
> > the time being (which could mean !PM dependency). If there is a need,
> > then the dependency will be removed.
> 
>  I can do it later if you prefer.

can we add the "depends on ... && PM" now, later, once
you'll extend it, you remove it again?

Personally I'd prefer this way rather than having a driver that 
does nothing in case of !PM.

Andi