From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/4] drm: Introduce generic probe function for component based masters.
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:09:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151020100909.GW32532@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACvgo51szQz9iu55mP+Qz+VCzjB-20K169MpX6_71ppcnGHXzg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:00:55AM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Hi Liviu,
>
> On 20 October 2015 at 10:23, Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> wrote:
> > A lot of component based DRM drivers use a variant of the same code
> > as the probe function. They bind the crtc ports in the first iteration
> > and then scan through the child nodes and bind the encoders attached
> > to the remote endpoints. Factor the common code into a separate
> > function called drm_of_component_probe() in order to increase code
> > reuse.
> >
> > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
> > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
> > Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/drm/drm_of.h | 13 +++++++
> > 2 files changed, 101 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> > index be38840..493c05c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> > +#include <linux/component.h>
> > #include <linux/export.h>
> > #include <linux/list.h>
> > #include <linux/of_graph.h>
> > @@ -61,3 +62,90 @@ uint32_t drm_of_find_possible_crtcs(struct drm_device *dev,
> > return possible_crtcs;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_of_find_possible_crtcs);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * drm_of_component_probe - Generic probe function for a component based master
> > + * @dev: master device containing the OF node
> > + * @compare_of: compare function used for matching components
> > + * @master_ops: component master ops to be used
> > + *
> > + * Parse the platform device OF node and bind all the components associated
> > + * with the master. Interface ports are added before the encoders in order to
> > + * satisfy their .bind requirements
> > + * See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/graph.txt for the bindings.
> > + *
> > + * Returns zero if successful, or one of the standard error codes if it fails.
> > + */
> > +int drm_of_component_probe(struct device *dev,
> > + int (*compare_of)(struct device *, void *),
> > + const struct component_master_ops *m_ops)
> > +{
> > + struct device_node *ep, *port, *remote;
> > + struct component_match *match = NULL;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + if (!dev->of_node)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Bind the crtc's ports first, so that drm_of_find_possible_crtcs()
> > + * called from encoder's .bind callbacks works as expected
> > + */
> > + for (i = 0; ; i++) {
> > + port = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "ports", i);
> > + if (!port)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + if (!of_device_is_available(port->parent)) {
> > + of_node_put(port);
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > +
> > + component_match_add(dev, &match, compare_of, port);
> > + of_node_put(port);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (i == 0) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "missing 'ports' property\n");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!match) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "no available port\n");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * For bound crtcs, bind the encoders attached to their remote endpoint
> > + */
> > + for (i = 0; ; i++) {
> > + port = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "ports", i);
> > + if (!port)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + if (!of_device_is_available(port->parent)) {
> > + of_node_put(port);
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > +
> Of the three drivers converted only the rockchip one has the above
> of_device_is_available() hunk. Based on the handling in previous loop
> I'm not entirely sure if it's needed, but if so shouldn't one mention
> the difference when converting the respective drivers ?
Yes, it should've been there, otherwise we'll end up binding encoders
which are connected to a CRTC which has been disabled - and that means
the DRM driver won't come up.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-20 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-20 9:23 [PATCH v4 0/4] drm: Cleanup probe function for component based masters Liviu Dudau
2015-10-20 9:23 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] drm: Introduce generic " Liviu Dudau
2015-10-20 10:00 ` Emil Velikov
2015-10-20 10:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-10-20 10:18 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-10-20 9:23 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/imx: Convert the probe function to the generic drm_of_component_probe() Liviu Dudau
2015-10-20 9:23 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/rockchip: " Liviu Dudau
2015-10-20 9:23 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] drm/armada: " Liviu Dudau
2015-10-20 10:02 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] drm: Cleanup probe function for component based masters Daniel Vetter
2015-10-20 10:18 ` Liviu Dudau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151020100909.GW32532@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).