From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] EDAC: Add AMD Seattle SoC EDAC
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:26:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151020172654.GC4943@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151020165744.GE31130@pd.tnic>
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:57:44PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:44:46AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> > > This second property doesn't describe the hardware in any way. It should
> > > be runtime-configurable and dpesn't belong in the DT.
> > >
> > > Regardless, the binding is wrong. This is in no way specific to AMD
> > > Seattle, and per the code is actually used to imply the presence of a
> > > Cortex-A57 feature. No reference to AMD Seattle belongs in the DT
> > > binding (with the exception of the example, perhaps), nor in the driver.
> > >
> > > NAK while this pretends to be something that it isn't. At minimum, you
> > > need to correctly describe the feature you are trying to add support
> > > for.
> > >
> > I will remove AMD specific string in compatibility field and make
> > the poll-delay-msec optional. Will also expose this as module
> > parameter as you suggested below.
>
> Btw, how much of this is implementing generic A57 functionality?
The driver is entirely A57 generic.
> If a lot, can we make this a generic a57_edac driver so that multiple
> vendors can use it?
Yes.
> How fast and how ugly can something like that become?
Not sure I follow.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-20 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-19 19:23 [PATCH] EDAC: Add AMD Seattle SoC EDAC Brijesh Singh
2015-10-19 20:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-10-19 20:52 ` Mark Rutland
2015-10-20 16:44 ` Brijesh Singh
2015-10-20 16:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-10-20 17:26 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-10-20 17:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-10-20 17:41 ` Mark Rutland
2015-10-20 19:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2015-10-21 1:55 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-10-21 9:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-10-21 10:01 ` Andre Przywara
2015-10-21 16:22 ` Brijesh Singh
2015-10-23 1:38 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-10-20 17:25 ` Mark Rutland
2015-10-21 1:45 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-10-20 2:21 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-10-20 21:26 ` Brijesh Singh
2015-10-21 1:35 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151020172654.GC4943@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).