From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] EDAC: Add AMD Seattle SoC EDAC
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:41:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151020174144.GD4943@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151020173639.GH31130@pd.tnic>
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:36:39PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:26:55PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > Btw, how much of this is implementing generic A57 functionality?
> >
> > The driver is entirely A57 generic.
> >
> > > If a lot, can we make this a generic a57_edac driver so that multiple
> > > vendors can use it?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Ok, cool.
>
> > > How fast and how ugly can something like that become?
> >
> > Not sure I follow.
>
> In the sense that some vendor might require just a little bit different
> handling or maybe wants to read some vendor-specific registers in
> addition to the architectural ones.
>
> Then we'll start adding vendor-specific hacks to that generic driver.
> And therefore the question how fast and how ugly such hacks would
> become.
>
> I guess we'll worry about that when we get there...
>
> So Brijesh, if you only need generic, architectural functionality,
> please call it arm64_edac or so and let's add it so that other arm64
> vendors can use it too.
Please note that this is specific to Cortex-A57, not ARMv8 or aarch64.
It is an IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED feature as implemented by Cortex-A57,
which by definition is not implemented by other CPUs. It is not provided
by the ARM architecture.
So this cannot be arm64_edac, but could potentially be cortex_a57_edac.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-20 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-19 19:23 [PATCH] EDAC: Add AMD Seattle SoC EDAC Brijesh Singh
2015-10-19 20:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-10-19 20:52 ` Mark Rutland
2015-10-20 16:44 ` Brijesh Singh
2015-10-20 16:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-10-20 17:26 ` Mark Rutland
2015-10-20 17:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-10-20 17:41 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-10-20 19:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2015-10-21 1:55 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-10-21 9:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-10-21 10:01 ` Andre Przywara
2015-10-21 16:22 ` Brijesh Singh
2015-10-23 1:38 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-10-20 17:25 ` Mark Rutland
2015-10-21 1:45 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-10-20 2:21 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-10-20 21:26 ` Brijesh Singh
2015-10-21 1:35 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151020174144.GD4943@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).